Mark Hanna, et ux v. Allan Margitan, et ux
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence-Berrey, J.
¶1 Mark and Jennifer Hanna appeal the trial court’s summary judgment order and award of attorney fees and costs to respondents. The trial court ruled that respondents’ easements over the Hannas’ lot were valid, and awarded respondents their reasonable attorney fees and costs for defending what it found to be a frivolous action. The Hannas contend (1) easements that preexist a short plat but that are not depicted thereon are extinguished by operation of law, (2) because such easements are extinguished, they cannot be revived because the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Matthew & Amy Johnson v. Lake Cushman Maintenance Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Chadwick & April Ferguson v. Martha Standley & Chuck StandleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Christopher Guest And Suzanne Guest v. David Lange And Karen LangeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Deanne C. Dewitt Freise & Eric L. Freise, Res. v. Anderson Vacation Property, Llc, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Friedmann v. Franklin Pierce Public SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.