Legal Opinion

Bozarth v. Atlantic Richfield Oil Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1992No. S-3990PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

John Bozarth, a pilot for Atlantic Rich-field Company (ARCO), was fired after he refused to participate in ARCO’s random *3drug-testing program. Bozarth sued, claiming that the dismissal was really in retaliation for whistle-blowing. Bozarth had repeatedly complained about unsafe practices in ARCO’s aviation department.

Shortly after filing suit, Bozarth applied for state unemployment insurance benefits. These were denied on the grounds that Bozarth’s discharge was due to work-related misconduct. The denial was upheld by the Appeals Tribunal of the Employment Security…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. DeNardo v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. Baugh Construction & Engineering Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Central Alaska Broadcasting, Inc. v. BracaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Brunet v. Dresser Olympic Division of Dresser Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in WashingtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Exxon Corp. v. BurglinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Rhodes v. ErionAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API