Legal Opinion
Black Ball Freight Service v. United States
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 6, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 3314PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before HAMLEY, Circuit Judge, and BOLDT and BEEKS, District Judges. BOLDT, District Judge:
Plaintiff motor freight carriers operating in the State of Washington brought this action under Section 17(9) of the Interstate Commerce Act (Title 49 U.S.C.A. Section 17(9)), and pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.A. Sections 1336, 1398, 2284 and 2321 through 2325, and Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act (Title 5, U.S.C.A. Sec. 1009), to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (hereinafter “ICC”).
By that order the ICC, over plaintiffs’ protest, granted applications for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Board of Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Morehead v. New York Ex Rel. TipaldoSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. BreedingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Niichel v. LancasterWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Acme Cartage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1968
- Briedablik, Big Valley, Lofall, Edgewater, Surfrest, North End Community Ass'n v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Briedablik, Big Valley, Lofall, Edgewater, Surfrest, North End Community Ass'n v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.