Legal Opinion · Dissent

Briedablik, Big Valley, Lofall, Edgewater, Surfrest, North End Community Ass'n v. Kitsap County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 26, 1982No. 9325-8-IPublished

1DissentAndersen, C.J.

(dissenting)—The majority holds that once a county is sued in an adjoining county, the county sued cannot obtain a change of venue regardless of what showing it may make. I respectfully dissent on three separate grounds—none of which relate to the merits of that result.

First, the majority's intricate interpretation of two statutes plain on their face loses sight of that most elementary of all rules of statutory construction, that

Where the language of the statutes involved is clear and unambiguous it requires no construction or interpretation.

*120(Italics mine.) Thompson v. Lewis Cy., 92 Wn.2d…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. Washington Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Seeber v. Public Disclosure CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Griffin v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Russell v. Marenakos Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API