Legal Opinion

Briedablik, Big Valley, Lofall, Edgewater, Surfrest, North End Community Ass'n v. Kitsap County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 26, 1982No. 9325-8-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

33 Wn. App. 108 (1982)

652 P.2d 383

THE BRIEDABLIK, BIG VALLEY, LOFALL, EDGEWATER, SURFREST, NORTH END COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, ET AL, Petitioners,

v.

KITSAP COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents.

No. 9325-8-I.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

October 11, 1982.

As amended by order October 26, 1982.

Roger M. Leed, for petitioners.

C. Danny Clem, Prosecuting Attorney for Kitsap County, W. Daniel Phillips, Deputy, Joel M. Gordon, and Peter Buck, for respondents.

[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals October 26, 1982.]

CALLOW, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the King County Superior Court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. Washington Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Seeber v. Public Disclosure CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Griffin v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API