Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Taylor

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1956No. A-5638PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert

As originally begun, this suit was by W. H. Taylor, as plaintiff, against some thirty-five defendants to determine and settle a number of title matters. As it reaches us the case involves only the question of whether the respondent is entitled to the whole of the returns from a reservation in a lease of l/16th of the minerals produced from certain tracts out of the Backward Seven Branch, as he contends, or whether, as petitioners contend, the respondent is entitled to only % of the l/16th and they the other % of the 1/16th. This question was decided in favor of the respondent by the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Nat'l Bk. of Corpus Christi v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sheppard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Morriss v. First Nat. Bank of MissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Hill v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. McMahon v. ChristmannTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Martin v. GlassDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
  4. BP America Production Co. v. ZaffiriniCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API