Griffith v. Taylor
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert
As originally begun, this suit was by W. H. Taylor, as plaintiff, against some thirty-five defendants to determine and settle a number of title matters. As it reaches us the case involves only the question of whether the respondent is entitled to the whole of the returns from a reservation in a lease of l/16th of the minerals produced from certain tracts out of the Backward Seven Branch, as he contends, or whether, as petitioners contend, the respondent is entitled to only % of the l/16th and they the other % of the 1/16th. This question was decided in favor of the respondent by the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Nat'l Bk. of Corpus Christi v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Sheppard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Morriss v. First Nat. Bank of MissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Hill v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- McMahon v. ChristmannTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Martin v. GlassDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
- BP America Production Co. v. ZaffiriniCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.