Santoro v. SCHULTHESS
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEATHERS, J.:
Appellant Warren Schulthess seeks review of an order requiring him to pay damages to Respondents Peter Santoro and Mary Santoro for trespass and for intentional interference with prospective contractual relations. Schulthess also appeals the requirements that he lower the level of his pond and remove a motor home from his property. We reverse.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In March 2002, Schulthess, a Columbia resident, purchased a pond (North Lake) and an adjoining triangular, unimproved parcel in Orangeburg County. At that time, the level of the pond was very low because its spillway…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Renden, Inc. v. Liberty Real Estate Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Callum v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Kinard v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- Matsell v. Crowfield Plantation Community Services Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Snow v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- McNaughton v. Charleston Charter School for Math & Science, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.