Legal Opinion

State v. Alston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1983No. 176A81PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The principal issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in allowing testimony that one of the victims told Sheriff Dement that he and the defendant had engaged in an argument two days before the shooting. For the reasons stated herein, we find no reversible error.

The evidence presented by the State tended to show that Robert Warren Foster operated a store known as R. W. Foster’s Grocery in the Kearney Community in Franklin County. On 9 February 1981, Robert Foster and Jack Franklin Stainback were in Foster’s store. They were last seen alive at approximately 8:35…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API