State ex rel. Harmon v. Bender
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The controlling question in this case is whether videotapes of trial proceedings are public records subject to the public access provisions of R.C. 149.43(B). We have previously held that mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel a governmental unit to provide public access to public records under R.C. 149.43. See State, ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co., v. Lesak (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 1. For the following reasons we find that videotapes of trial proceedings are public records, and we *17issue a writ of mandamus directing respondent to allow relator access to the videotape of State v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. LesakOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Citizens' Bar Ass'n v. GagliardoOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Margolius v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Scripps Howard Broadcasting Co. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Fostoria Daily Review Co. v. Fostoria Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Slagle v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. OglivieU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.