Legal Opinion

In Re Providence Water Supply Board's Application to Change Rate Schedules

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 25, 2010No. 2007-378-M.PPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court.

This case is before the Supreme Court as a statutory petition for certiorari filed by the petitioner, the City of Providence (city), pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 39-5-1. The city is seeking review of a decision by the Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission (PUC) 1 denying a rate increase to the Providence Water Supply Board (PWSB or board) for reimbursement of sums paid for the PWSB’s retirees’ health-care coverage and benefits. The city seeks review of the report and order that the PUC issued in Docket No. 8832. After careful review of the record in this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gem Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. RossiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of New England, Inc. v. GelatiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  3. Narragansett Electric Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. Providence Gas Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  5. In Re Woonsocket Water DepartmentSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Review of Proposed Town of New Shoreham ProjectSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  2. Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In Re Kent County Water Authority Change Rate SchedulesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  4. Narragansett Electric Co. v. Rhode Island Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  5. ACP Land, LLC v. The Rhode Island Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API