Legal Opinion

Ozanic v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 10, 1949No. 125-198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Shipping Assets Clearing, Ltd., a British corporation, moves for admission as intervening petitioner and for a decree directing payment to itself as the true party in interest, of the recovery heretofore adjudged against the United States in favor of libellant as bailee of the S. S. Petar, sunk in collision with a U. S. Naval Tanker. Issues of fact having arisen, they Were tried, to the court.

Petitioner is the assignee of the claim by assignment from the Yugoslav Government, which had nationalized the Yugoslav *6corporate owner of the Petar, together with all its claims…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. BelmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Erwin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. United States v. GillisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ozanic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. Saint John Marine Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Improved Premises Located at Northwest Corner of Irving Place & Sixteenth StreetDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API