Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 7, 2008No. Civil Action 01-2094(RCL), 01-2684(RCL)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on various post-judgment motions including: motions [273, 297, and 306] by the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (“JBIC”), the Bank of Japan (“BOJ”), and the Export Import Bank of Korea (“KEX-IM”) to quash writs of attachment on judgment, and plaintiffs’ motion [286] for appointment of a receiver. Upon consideration of the motions, the oppositions and replies thereto, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, this Court finds that the garnishees’ motions to quash should be GRANTED, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Saudi Arabia v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, UsamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Phoenix Consulting, Inc. v. Republic of AngolaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Foremost-Mckesson, Inc. v. The Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Hassan El-Fadl v. Central Bank of JordanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Islamic Republic of Iran Terrorism LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Sterling Savings Bank v. Citadel Development Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2009
- De Sousa v. Embassy of the Republic of AngolaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.