Legal Opinion

Ozanic v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 10, 1951No. 201, Docket 21931PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Chief Judge.

The libellant, Ozanic appeals from a decree in the admiralty, marking “discharged and satisfied” an earlier decree in the same suit which made an award of $100,447.83 in his favor against the United States; Shipping Assets Clearing, Ltd., appeals from an order denying it leave to intervene in the same suit. Ozanic, who had been master of the ship “Petar,” originally brought the suit under the Public Vessels Act 1 to recover for her loss on March 8, 1942, in a collision with a tanker owned by the United States, in which both ships were at fault. At the time of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. BelmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United Transportation & Lighterage Co. v. New York & Baltimore Transp. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  4. The ManduCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Castner, Curran & Bullitt, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Shanghai Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. American Commercial Lines, Inc. v. The Valley Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Grace Line, Inc., Libelant-Appellee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API