Legal Opinion

City of Fontana v. Atkinson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1963No. Civ. 7043PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN (R. M.), J. * —

Appellants appeal from a judgment in favor of respondents after a court trial in which appellants sought to enjoin the unlawful extension or enlargement of nonconforming uses and the unlawful rebuilding of demolished nonconforming structures and the relocating thereof by respondents in violation of the City of Fontana zoning ordinance and Uniform Building Code.

The first cause of action seeks to restrict respondents to a certain part of land owned by respondent Atkinson from using or devoting to use any area or any portion of his land for the purpose of operating a dairy…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Edmonds v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Independent Housing Services v. Fillmore Center AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
  2. Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hill v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Ryan Outdoor Advertising, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API