Lonchar v. Thomas
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
This case asks us to decide whether a federal court may dismiss a first federal habeas petition for general “equitable” reasons beyond those embodied in the relevant statutes, Federal Habeas Corpus Rules, and prior precedents. We decide that the Court of Appeals erred in doing so in this case. The primary “equitable” consideration favoring dismissal of the “eleventh hour” petition before us is serious delay. A Federal Habeas Corpus Rule deals specifically with delay. See 28 U. S. C. § 2254 Rule 9(a) (permitting courts to dismiss a habeas petition when “it appears that the state ... has been…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by437 opinions
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Percy Stanley Harris v. Ronald Hutchinson, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
432 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.