Nathan S. Berkman v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRADFORD, Judge.
Appellant-Defendant Nathan Berkman appeals from his conviction of and sentence for Felony Murder. 1 Berkman raises five issues, which we restate as follows:
I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Berkman’s motion to dismiss, which was made on the basis that the instant charge was barred by prohibitions against double jeopardy;
II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Berkman’s mistrial motion, which was made on the basis that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain testimony from a previous trial;
III. Whether the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kenneth Brittain v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Nathan Berkman v. Frank VanihelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- State v. LebrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Kevin Davis v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kevin A. Mathews v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.