Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. County of Riverside
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Under Proposition 13 (Cal. Const., art. XIII A), ad valorem taxes on real property are limited to 1 percent of full cash value. (Id., § 1, subd. (a).) However, property that changed ownership after the 1975-1976 tax year is subject to reassessment. (Id., § 2, subd. (a).) In order to determine whether such a change has occurred as to property owned by various legal entities, including corporations, the Legislature enacted section 64 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Subdivision (a) states that, with certain exceptions set forth therein, the purchase or transfer of corporate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.