Legal Opinion
Moorer v. Noble L.A. Events, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 11, 2019No. B282631PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFeuer, J.
*221*738David Moorer appeals from the March 23, 2017 order denying his request for entry of a default judgment against Noble L.A. Events, Inc. (Noble), and dismissing the case. The trial court denied Moorer's request because Moorer refused to comply with the court's order to distribute 25 percent of the penalties to be allocated under the Labor Code Private Attorney General Act of 2004 ( Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq. (PAGA) )1 to the 23 aggrieved employees in a pro rata amount. Instead, Moorer allocated the entire 25 percent to himself. On appeal, Moorer contends a PAGA action is a qui tam action,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Liliana Canela v. CostcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Zakaryan v. Men's Wearhouse, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Mejia v. Merchants Bldg. Maint., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Gomez v. J. Jacobo Farm Labor Contractor, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.