Legal Opinion

Schubert v. Target Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 2009No. 08-921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.

| ¶Appellant Roger Schubert appeals an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court granting a directed verdict in favor of Ap-pellee Target Stores, Inc. On appeal, Appellant avers that it was error for the trial court to grant a directed verdict because he presented sufficient evidence to create a fact question as to whether Appellee was negligent. This court assumed jurisdiction of this appeal, as it is a second appeal; hence, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule l-2(a)(7). Because there remains an outstanding party with a potential claim, we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schubert v. Target Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Jones v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Richardson v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. EasterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schubert v. Target Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas v. GuyerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API