Legal Opinion
Schubert v. Target Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 27, 2005No. 04-882PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
Appellant Roger Schubert appeals from the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Target Stores, Inc. (Target). Schubert argues the following points on appeal: (1) the circuit court erred in concluding that Arkansas’ conflicts-of-law rules require application of the substantive law of the state of Louisiana to this case; and (2) the circuit court erred in its application of Louisiana law. We reverse and remand on the first point.
Schubert is a resident of Enid, Oklahoma, and was employed by J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. (Hunt), as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wallis v. Mrs. Smith's Pie Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- McGinty v. Ballentine Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Gomez v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Schlemmer v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Maddox v. SteelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ganey v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Jaiguay v. VasquezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Shelby County Health Care Corp. v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Schubert v. Target Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Norton v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.