Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Rodgers
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 14, 1997No. 96-483PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This is an appeal from a default judgment. The appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b).
Carl Rodgers alleged he was seriously injured by a falling water pipe while working on renovation of the Pulaski County Courthouse. Mr. Rodgers was employed by IK Electric Service Co., a subcontractor on the project. Mr. Rodgers and his wife, Norlene Rodgers, brought a negligence action to recover damages resulting from his injury and Ms. Rodgers’s loss of consortium. The defendants were C.W. Richardson, Greg Richardson, CWR Construction, Inc. (referred to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Maroney v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- South County, Inc. v. First Western Loan Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Kinkead v. SpillersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Williamson v. MisemerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Morrow Land Valley Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Shackelford v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Rodgers v. CWR Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Richardson v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Hodges v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.