Legal Opinion

Kilbourne v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided October 20, 1980No. Claim No. 63495PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold E. Koreman, J.

The defendant moves for dismissal of the amended claim herein on the ground that the causes of action alleged are barred by the Statute of Limitations. A prior motion seeking dismissal of the fifth and sixth causes of action for untimeliness, and dismissal of the second and fourth causes of action for failure to allege a cause of action was held in abeyance pending disposition of the motion for dismissal of the claim in its entirety.

The claim is based on defamation and arises out of certain statements alleged to be libelous and slanderous, which were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Harvey Chalmers & Son, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Patterson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Clark v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Davis v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Kamdem-Ouaffo v. PepsiCo, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Trayer v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Schwartzberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Wilson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API