Azurin v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MANKIN, Associate Judge:
Appellant seeks reversal of a June 15, 1990, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) which denied appellant en*490titlement to non-service-connected pension benefits. On December 12, 1991, the Court denied the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) motion for summary affirmance and to stay further proceedings, but accepted the motion in lieu of a brief. The Court has jurisdiction of the case under 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a) (formerly § 4052(a)).
I. BACKGROUND
Official records from the Philippines indicate that Azurin was a reservist inducted into the United States Armed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Murphy v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- EF v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Godwin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Myers v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chisem v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Mata v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Culver v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Kinnaman v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Laposky v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.