Myers v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
On December 18, 1989, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) held that the appellant, James F. Myers, did not qualify for a non-service connected pension on the grounds that he was not 100% disabled nor unemployable by reason of a permanent disability. The BVA made no findings, however, regarding the appellant’s alleged service connection for his psychiatric, back, feet, and hand conditions. Upon consideration of the pleadings and record in this case, we hold that the BVA was on notice that the appellant had requested that the rating board decisions denying service…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Payne v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
3Cited by94 opinions
- Dingess - Hartman v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Bernard v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- EF v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Hamilton v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Smith v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.