Legal Opinion

Deep Photonics Corp. v. LaChapelle

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2021No. S067853PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

274 Argued and submitted March 18, decision of Court of Appeals and limited judgment of circuit court affirmed July 1, 2021 DEEP PHOTONICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Joseph G. LaCHAPELLE et al., Defendants. James FIELD and Joseph G. LaChapelle, Respondents on Review, v. Dong Kwan KIM, Petitioner on Review, and DAEHONG TECHNEW CORPORATION, a Korean corporation, et al., Third-Party Defendants. (CC C114435CV) (CA A158705) (SC S067853)

491 P3d 60

Shareholders Joseph LaChapelle and James Field (plaintiffs) brought claims on behalf of Deep Photonics Corporation (DPC) against…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  5. Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eklof v. PerssonOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State/Klamath County v. HersheyOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Boldt v. Brookdale Senior Living CommunitiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Boldt v. Brookdale Senior Living CommunitiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Carlson v. East Salem Assisted Living, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API