Texas Employment Commission v. Holberg
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GREENHILL, Justice.
This is an action for benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Act, Article 5221b — 1 and articles which follow 1 instituted by Anton F. Holberg and W. D. Smith. Both claimants retired as machinists from the American Bridge Company at age 69. A few days after retirement, each man filed a claim for unemployment benefits. Both were ruled to be ineligible to receive benefits because they were not “available for work” as required by Article 5221b-2 (d). The Commission’s decision was set aside by the district court on the grounds that it was not supported by substantial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mohler v. Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Texas Employment Commission v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Dwyer v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Gerst v. Guardian Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Mercer v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Brown v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Edwards v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Floresville Electric Power & Light System, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.