Legal Opinion

Texas Employment Commission v. Holberg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1969No. B-1256PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Justice.

This is an action for benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Act, Article 5221b — 1 and articles which follow 1 instituted by Anton F. Holberg and W. D. Smith. Both claimants retired as machinists from the American Bridge Company at age 69. A few days after retirement, each man filed a claim for unemployment benefits. Both were ruled to be ineligible to receive benefits because they were not “available for work” as required by Article 5221b-2 (d). The Commission’s decision was set aside by the district court on the grounds that it was not supported by substantial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mohler v. Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Texas Employment Commission v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Dwyer v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gerst v. Guardian Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Mercer v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Brown v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Edwards v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Floresville Electric Power & Light System, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API