Legal Opinion

In re the Appeal by McCrary

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1993No. 9210SC656PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Petitioner Sue S. McCrary contends the trial court erred by affirming an order of a Deputy Commissioner of Insurance (Commissioner) which voided, ab initio, insurance coverage on her property at Topsail Beach, North Carolina. We disagree.

On or about 24 September 1990, Donnie Hamm (Hamm), a licensed State Farm Insurance Agent, was assisting petitioner in obtaining insurance coverage for her beach house at Topsail Beach, North Carolina. Hamm and petitioner submitted an insurance application to the North Carolina Insurance Underwriting Association (Association), which was entitled…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Walker v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Lackey v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. ACT-UP Triangle v. Commission for Health ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Meads v. North Carolina Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of AldermenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API