Legal Opinion
Lackey v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 13, 1982No. 88PA82PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
We agree with the Court of Appeals that the appropriate standard of review in this action is provided by the review provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act. G.S. 150A-51 provides in pertinent part that a reviewing court may reverse the decision of an agency if:
“[T]he substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced because the agency findings, inferences, conclusions or decisions are:
* * *(4) Affected by . . . error of law; or(5) Unsupported by substantial evidence admissible under G.S. 150A-29(a) or G.S. 150A-30 in view of the entire record as submitted .…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Frances B. Walden v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services for the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Robert K. Allen v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Grace Drilling Co. v. Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Correll v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Henderson v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Division of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.