Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mix v. Newland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1977No. 17870, SC P-2489PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is the second time that a dispute over a chrysanthemum sport, "Copper Anne,” has come before this court. The first was a declaratory judgment proceeding wherein the plaintiff, Marvin Mix, and the defendant, Ron Newland, Mix’s employee, both claimed to be the owner and discoverer of the new plant. Newland also contended that exclusive jurisdiction of the dispute was vested in the United States Patent Office because he had applied for a patent, and plaintiff Mix had instituted an interference proceeding before the Interference Board of the U.S. Patent Office. The trial court found that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Interest of C.N.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. CrenshawOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Renninger v. RenningerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API