State v. Hitesman/Page
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
In this consolidated appeal, defendants seek reversal of their convictions for manufacture of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. They assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motions to suppress and to controvert. They also argue that some of the conditions of probation imposed by the trial court are invalid. We affirm the convictions, but vacate the conditions of probation.
In June, 1989, the Wasco County Sheriffs office received an anonymous letter saying that defendant Page was growing marijuana on his property, a 40-acre parcel located in rural Wasco County. On June 15, Deputy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. OhlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. SomflethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. McIntyre/PereiraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. MiglavsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. MaackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.