Cablevision of Winston-Salem, Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Appellants assign as error entry of the order continuing the injunction in effect pendente lite. Appeal from an interlocutory order of this type is not considered premature and will be entertained by this Court if a substantial right of the appellant would be adversely affected by continuance of the injunction in effect pending final determination of the case. G.S. 1-277; Board of Elders v. Jones, 273 N.C. 174, 159 S.E. 2d 545; Conference v. Creech, 256 N.C. 128, 123 S.E. 2d 619. In the present case the order appealed from restrained the governing body of the City of Winston-Salem from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Milk Commission v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Western Conference of Original Free Will Baptists of North Carolina v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Monarch Cablevision, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Shaw v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Forrest Paschal MacHinery Co. v. MilholenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Capitol Cable, Inc. v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Decker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.