Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. Blair
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
The order appealed from is interlocutory. However, appeal from such an order will not be considered premature if a substantial right of appellant would be adversely affected by continuance of the injunction in effect pending final determination of the case. G.S. 1-277; Board of Elders v. Jones, 273 N.C. 174, 159 S.E. 2d 545; Conference v. Creech and Teasley v. Creech and Miles, 256 N.C. 128, 123 S.E. 2d 619; Cablevision v. Winston-Salem, 3 N.C. App. 252, 164 S.E. 2d 737. A substantial right of defendant is affected by the order restraining him from engaging in business in the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Jewel Box Stores Corporation v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Hood v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ellis v. James v. Hurson Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Robins & Weill, Inc. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Technical Aid Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Keith v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Wade S. Dunbar Insurance Agency, Inc. v. BarberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.