Legal Opinion

Forrest Paschal MacHinery Co. v. Milholen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1975No. 7518SC454 and 7518SC582PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Although both plaintiff and defendants docketed separate records and filed briefs with respect to the questions presented by each of the appeals, we deem it practical to address all questions raised in each appeal in one opinion.

The order from which defendants and plaintiff appeal restrains defendant from competing with plaintiff pending trial of the cause on its merits, and is, therefore, interlocutory. Generally, an appeal from an interlocutory order is premature. However, the appeal may be considered by appellate courts if a substantial right of the appellant would be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. James C. Greene Company v. KelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Wilmar, Incorporated v. LilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Raleigh, Inc. v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Manpower of Guilford County, Inc. v. HedgecockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. McKinnon v. CV INDUSTRIES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Simko, Inc. v. Graymar Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Schultz and Assoc. v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API