Legal Opinion

Simon v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 10, 1964No. [App. No. 159, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This is an application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief by Judge Shook. The applicant was convicted of sodomy in 1958 and subsequently committed to Patuxent Institution after having been found to be a defective delinquent. He was paroled from Patuxent in 1961, but on October 8, 1962, he was alleged to have committed the crime of assault and battery upon two girls, aged 10 and 11. He was tried upon information before a trial magistrate in the People’s Court, represented by experienced counsel of his own selection, convicted and sentenced to three years on each charge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Roberts v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. O'CONNOR v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Shefton v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Mills v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Gee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Martin v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  4. McMannis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Gee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API