Legal Opinion

Progressive Specialty Ins. v. Hammonds

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 15, 1989No. 87-1247PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Progressive Specialty Insurance Company ("Progressive") appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Ellis Monroe Hammonds on Progressive's third-party claim against Hammonds. The trial court made the summary judgment final, pursuant to Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P.

On January 19, 1987, Hammonds's automobile, in which James Scott Fuller was a passenger, collided with a second vehicle. As a result of that accident, Fuller sustained serious injuries and subsequently died. At the time of the accident, Hammonds carried automobile liability insurance with Alfa Mutual Insurance Company ("Alfa")1;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Branch v. Southtrust Bank of Dothan, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Vogt v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Lambert v. State FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Harris v. M & S TOYOTA, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Star Freight, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Pavilion Development v. Jbj PartnershipSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Verchot v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API