Legal Opinion
Harris v. M & S TOYOTA, INC.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 11, 1991No. 89-404, 89-414PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
This Court's opinion issued September 28, 1990, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor:
Scott and Celine Harris, the purchasers of a used car, sued M S Toyota, Inc. ("Toyota City"), on a fraud claim and obtained a jury verdict. The trial court granted Toyota City's motion for a new trial on the ground that the court had erroneously allowed the Harrises to present evidence regarding an earlier transaction between Toyota City and another customer. The Harrises appeal this grant of a new trial. Toyota City cross-appeals, contending that the trial court…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Alabama Power Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Southern States Ford, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hicks v. Globe Life and Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Boyd v. Homes of Legend, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- McGowan v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.