Legal Opinion

Lambert v. State Farm

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1991No. 89-1098PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal presents once again an issue that has been described as "[t]he single most important unresolved issue concerning underinsured motorist coverage"1 — the right of an insured to settle with a tort-feasor, and to give the tort-feasor a complete release without getting the consent of the insured's carrier of underinsured motorist coverage to the settlement. This appeal is from a summary judgment in which the trial court held, as a matter of law, that an underinsured motorist insurance carrier, which had refused to consent to a settlement between its insured with the tort-feasor, was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Samply v. Integrity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. LeFevre v. WestberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. West American Insurance v. PopaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Guajardo v. AIG HAWAI'I INS. CO. INC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Mann v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. SouthTrust Bank v. JONES, MORRISON, WOMACKCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API