Legal Opinion

LaBranche v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1972No. 47486PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. In Garrett v. Royal Bros. Co., 225 Ga. 533 (170 SE2d 294) it was stated: "The conduct of a defend ant cannot be declared to be negligent, as a matter of law, unless it has been so declared by a lawmaking body, and, in the absence of such a declaration the jury is the arbiter of the question of whether a defendant’s conduct on a given occasion is negligent, and, if so, whether such negligence is the degree of negligence required for a recovery by a plaintiff.” On their motion for summary judgment the same rule of law must be applied to a plaintiff as against the contention of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Royal Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Chotas v. J. P. Allen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Stuckey's Carriage Inn v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Goodwin v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Herrington v. Stone Mountain Memorial Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sutton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Armagast v. Medici Gallery & Coffee House, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Jackson Atlantic, Inc. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Abney v. London Iron & Metal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Wright v. PIGGLY WIGGLY SOUTHERN, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API