LaBranche v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. In Garrett v. Royal Bros. Co., 225 Ga. 533 (170 SE2d 294) it was stated: "The conduct of a defend ant cannot be declared to be negligent, as a matter of law, unless it has been so declared by a lawmaking body, and, in the absence of such a declaration the jury is the arbiter of the question of whether a defendant’s conduct on a given occasion is negligent, and, if so, whether such negligence is the degree of negligence required for a recovery by a plaintiff.” On their motion for summary judgment the same rule of law must be applied to a plaintiff as against the contention of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garrett v. Royal Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Chotas v. J. P. Allen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Stuckey's Carriage Inn v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Goodwin v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Herrington v. Stone Mountain Memorial Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sutton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Armagast v. Medici Gallery & Coffee House, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Jackson Atlantic, Inc. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Abney v. London Iron & Metal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Wright v. PIGGLY WIGGLY SOUTHERN, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.