Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 1970No. 45292PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

The burden is on the defendant who moves for summary judgment to produce evidence which conclusively negates at least one essential element entitling the plaintiff to recover under every theory fairly to be drawn from the pleadings and evidence. Saunders v. Vikers, 116 Ga. App. 733 (2) (158 SE2d 324). The plaintiff in this case occupied the status of a social invitee, i.e., a licensee. Stanton v. Grubb, 114 Ga. App. 350 (151 SE2d 237). There is no question in this case of anticipating the plaintiff’s presence on the premises, since her presence in the house, and the fact that she…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mandeville Mills v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Saunders v. VikersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Wardlaw v. Executive Committee of the Baptist ConventionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Todd v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. Leach v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Herschel McDaniel Funeral Home, Inc. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Scott v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Frankel v. AntmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Boggs v. Griffeth Bros. Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Plant v. LowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API