Legal Opinion
Chotas v. J. P. Allen & Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 2, 1966No. 41881PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
The plaintiff testified that she did not see the tear or split in the mat before she caught her heel in it because she “wasn’t looking down to see it.” And she answered in the affirmative counsel’s questions on cross examination: “Q. If you had been looking down you could have seen it, couldn’t you? A. I imagine I could have, yes, sir. Q. It was light enough to see it, wasn’t it? A. That’s right. Q. You saw it afterwards without any difficulty? A. Yes, sir.” And she answered “No” to further questions: “Q. Mrs. Chotas, there was nothing to *732prevent you seeing this split in the rug…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wynne v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Fuller v. Louis Steyerman & Sons Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Hill v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Lebby v. Atlanta Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Holman v. American Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Wakefield v. AR Winter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Ellington v. Tolar Consruction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Colonial Stores, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.