Nichols v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
When the evidence presented to prove a criminal offense is wholly circumstantial, a defendant is entitled to an instruction advising the jury that it must exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence in order to convict. We grant transfer to review the definition of "wholly circumstantial evidence."
Roy D. Nichols was convicted of reckless homicide, a class C felony, Ind.Code § 35-42-1-5 (West 1986), and operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a class A misdemeanor, Ind.Code § 9-30-5-2 (West Supp.Pamphlet 1991). The Court of Appeals reversed his convictions and remanded…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Spradlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Alfaro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- New v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Treadway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Hampton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Buie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Spencer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.