Legal Opinion

Spradlin v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1991No. 15S04-9104-CR-300PublishedCited by 180 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAHULIK, Justice.

Michael Spradlin and Timothy Spradlin ("'the Spradlins"), in separate petitions to transfer, ask this Court to clarify the question as to whether or not it is reversible error to fail to instruct the jury that, in order to find the defendants guilty of attempted murder, the State must prove that, at the time of the commission of the act, the defendants intended to kill the victim. We answer that question in the affirmative and hold that the jury should have been instructed that, in order to convict the defendants of the crime of attempted murder, the State must prove that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zickefoose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Heald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Abdul-Wadood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Santana v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by180 opinions

  1. Guyton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Blanche v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lambert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API