Hampton v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
We affirm the denial of the defendant’s post-conviction claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel but hold that an instruction on the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not obviate the necessity, where the conduct of the defendant constituting the commission of a charged offense is proven exclusively by circumstantial evidence, of an additional jury instruction advising the jury that proof by circumstantial evidence must be so conclusive and sure as to exclude every reasonable theory of innocence.
The defendant was convicted of murder, rape, and…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Daniel Brewington v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Thomas W. Oster, II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lee Travis Griffin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Dustin E. McCowan v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.