Legal Opinion
Castaneda v. Holcomb
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 1981No. Civ. 23219PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
This is an appeal from a judgment in a declaratory relief action brought to construe a provision in the Charter of the City of San Bernardino. Defendant W. R. “Bob” Holcomb contends that the court below did not construe the provision correctly.
At issue is section 31 of the charter, which provides: “No order, resolution or ordinance shall have effect without approval of the Mayor, except when five (5) members of the Common Council concur in its adoption. In case of orders, the approval of the Mayor shall be presumed unless at the same meeting at which the order is passed,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re HochbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HaightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Troy Gold Industries, Ltd. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Wilson v. City of Laguna BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.