Legal Opinion

Stovall v. Adair

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before Jolm C. Tarsney, D istrict Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion , of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The plaintiffs in error brought suit in the district court of Canadian county against Virginia G. Adair and R. B. Adair, defendants in error, to recover judgment upon two promissory notes for the sum of $500 each, and interest, executed in the state of Georgia, on the 8th day of February, 1892, by the defendants in error, jointly and severally, and payable tó W. W. Stovall & Bros, the plaintiffs in error. The defendant, Virginia G. Adair, was a married woman at the time of executing the note, and was the sister-in-law of her CO' defendant, R. B. Adair.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ætna Insurance v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Ward v. StoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Cummings v. LittleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
  4. Bank of British Columbia v. JeffsWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Culbertson v. WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Linton v. Chestnutt-Gibbons Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Keyes v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Hodgins v. Northwestern Finance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Producers State Bank v. DancigerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API