Colegrove v. Cameron MacHine Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
D. BROOKS SMITH, Chief Judge.
Before me is defendant Allen-Bradley’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial. Dkt. no. 92. Plaintiff Charles Colegrove brought a strict liability action against Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. and Allen-Bradley Company, LLC (collectively “AB”) for injuries he sustained while working on a paper winding machine at the West-vaco Paper Company, and the jury found in his favor. A-B is entitled to neither judgment as a matter of law nor a new trial in this matter, and I therefore deny their motion.
I
On April 16,1997,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Patzig v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stephens v. Paris Cleaners, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Nesbitt v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Brodsky v. Mile High Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- CRAWFORD v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Ruddy v. Polaris Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.