Brodsky v. Mile High Equipment Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
This is a product liability case involving an ice machine that electrocuted appellant Amy Brodsky’s husband, Max Brodsky. After a jury found in favor of the defendants, Amy Brodsky - individually, as administratrix of her husband’s estate and as guardian of her daughter (in all capacities, “Brodsky”)—sought a new trial, arguing that the District Court had erroneously admitted evidence relating to industry standards and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) citations and fines issued as a result of the accident. *55The District Court denied both the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-NortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Leaphart v. Whiting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Markovich v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Sheehan v. Cincinnati Shaper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. Dba Southwest Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nesbitt v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Thomas ex rel. Thomas v. Staples, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014