Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Paris Cleaners, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 2005PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, J.:

¶ 1 This distressing case comes before us as a consequence of the trial court’s granting all remaining defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We affirm.

¶ 2 On March 25, 1998, Jeffrey Stephens (“employee”), who had been employed by Penngraph, Inc. (“Penngraph”) for approximately six weeks, sustained burns over 74 percent of his body when a graphitizer on which he was working exploded. Penn-graph is a manufacturer of bulk carbon and graphite materials that are used in electric discharge machining. To produce the graphite materials, Penngraph utilized seven…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Krauss, C. v. Trane US Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Umbelina v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Coleman v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API