Legal Opinion

County of Humboldt v. Shelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1963No. Civ. 20810PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Plaintiff County of Humboldt (hereafter referred to as County) appeals from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict in an action for damages for the destruction of a bridge.

The complaint is in two counts. The first count sets forth a cause of action against the driver and owners of a certain Peterbilt logging truck, alleging in substance that one Brown, the driver thereof, so negligently operated said truck on May 11, 1957, “at or about 11:00 a.m.” as to cause it to collide with and demolish plaintiff’s bridge to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $100,000. The second count against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. LeRoy Fibre Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Kleinclaus v. Marin Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Johnson v. VisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Mixon v. Riverview HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Fransen v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Campbell v. ZokeltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API