Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Zokelt

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1969No. Civ. 24607PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

In these cross-actions for personal injuries and property damage sustained in an automobile collision, defendant and cross-complainant, Willy DeWinter, appeals from an order granting a new trial on grounds of inconsistency of the verdicts of plaintiff, Eva S. Campbell (hereafter Campbell), and defendant and cross-complainant, Carl G. Zokelt (hereafter Zokelt). DeWinter contends that the jurors’ affidavits erroneously stricken by the trial court indicate that the verdicts are not inconsistent, and that in any event, Campbell and Zokelt waived any rights they might have had by failing to object…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kollert v. CundiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Fernandez v. Consolidated Fisheries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Kralyevich v. MagriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Phipps v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Curtis v. San Pedro Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of San Diego v. D.R. Horton San Diego Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Lambert v. General MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Morris v. McCauley's Quality Transmission ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Cavallaro v. Michelin Tire Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. MIZEL v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API